On Wednesday, it was revelation of a caught telephone call between Donald Trump and US Ambassador to the EU Gordon Sondland during which the president may have gotten some information about Ukrainian examinations.

Friday's enormous advancements incorporated the White House arrival of an opposing readout of the Mr Trump's first telephone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and a presidential tweet that had Republicans in Congress scrambling.

1. The tweeter-in-boss 

Mr Trump has flaunted that his lead while in office - gruff language and lay it all out there tweeting - is "current presidential". Provided that this is true, welcome to a current presidential arraignment hearing.

A little more than an hour into Marie Yovanovitch's declaration, Mr Trump propelled the sort of Twitter fusillade that has become an ordinary part of his political collection. He scrutinized the envoy's capability, noticed that the Ukrainian president talked negatively about her and brought up that he has the privilege to fire negotiators freely.

What makes the minute noteworthy is that Committee Chair Adam Schiff allowed Yovanovitch to discredit the president's tweet nearly continuously.

Democrats are as of now portraying the president's conduct as witness terrorizing - and the most recent assault by the president against one of his own administration workers.

Republicans, whose announced system was to evade legitimately reproving the notoriety of a long-serving, very much regarded ambassador, will by and by discover a president who has changed the principles of commitment on the fly.


"I disagree with the tweet," Republican congresswoman Elise Stefank told a journalist throughout a break in the conference. "I think Ambassador Yovanovitch is a community worker, in the same way as other of our local officials in the outside assistance."

Mike Conaway, another Republican on the panel, said the president's tweet was "not something I would do".

On Wednesday, the White House said the president was not viewing the arraignment hearings. On day two, the president is completely locked in. His tweeting turned into the enormous feature from the morning's procedures, underscoring Yovanovitch's dispute that the president himself was the main thrust behind her expulsion.

Mr Trump may not be in the consultation room, yet his essence is being felt.

2. The puzzle of the 'missing' some portion of transcript 

On Thursday morning, the White House discharged an unpleasant transcript of Mr Trump's first telephone discussion with Ukrainian President Zelensky on 21 April.

In it, the two traded merriments. Mr Trump complimented Mr Zelensky on his political decision and proposed the plausibility of a White House visit.

Mr Zelensky welcomed the US president to his introduction in Kiev, and stopped his nation's scrumptious nourishment and accommodation. Mr Trump concurred, refering to his involvement in Ukrainians in his days as a wonder expo producer.

The White House outline of the discussion discharged at the time, in any case, paints an alternate picture. It said Mr Trump "noticed" that the Ukrainian political decision had been led in a reasonable and open procedure. It said he "underscored the resolute help of the United States for Ukraine's sway and regional trustworthiness".

What's more, it said Mr Trump told Mr Zelensky that the two would cooperate "to execute changes that reinforce majority rules system, increment flourishing, and root out debasement".

None of those things occurred.

It brings up issues concerning why Mr Trump didn't discuss debasement or embrace Ukraine's regional trustworthiness in the call, especially given Ukraine's history of prosecutorial unfortunate behavior and Russian help for radicals battling Ukrainians in the country's eastern outskirt district. The rundown may have been what the US international strategy group needed the president to underscore, yet he didn't.

resident's discussions with remote pioneers.

The abberations between the April Ukrainian synopsis and the real discussion may leave numerous Americans - and outside pioneers - thinking about how much trustworthiness to put in those archives.